Fondation canadienne de la recherche sur les services santé

Sources de référence

1. Lomas J. 2006. Un nouveau rôle pour les processus de délibération (éditorial). Liens; 9(4): 1,6. www.fcrss.ca/migrated/pdf/mythbusters/links_v9n4_f.pdf
2. Caplan N et al. 1975. The use of social science knowledge in policy decisions at the national level: A report to respondents. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan: 1-63.
3. Innvaer S et al. 2002. Health policy-makers’ perceptions of their own use of evidence: A systematic review. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy; 7: 239-244.
4. Lindblom CE and Cohen DK. 1979. Usable knowledge: Social science and social problem solving. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
5. Fondation canadienne de la recherche sur les services de santé. 1999. Questions de liens et d’échanges entre les chercheurs et les décideurs. www.fcrss.ca/migrated/pdf/mythbusters/linkage_f.pdf
6. Lavis JN et al. 2003a. How can research organizations more effectively transfer research knowledge to decision makers? Milbank Quarterly; 81(Suppl 2): 221-248.
7. Huberman, M. 1994. Research utilization: The state of the art. Knowledge and Policy: The International Journal of Knowledge Transfer and Utilization; 7(4): 13-33.
8. Roos NP and Shapiro E. 1999. From research to policy: What have we learned? Medical Care; 27(6): JS291-305.
9. Lomas J. 1997. Improving Research Dissemination and Uptake in the Health Sector: Beyond the Sound of One Hand Clapping. www.chsrf.ca/migrated/pdf/mythbusters/handclapping_e.pdf
10. Ross SE et al. 2003. Partnership experiences: Involving decision-makers in the research process. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy; 8(2): 26-34.
11. Lomas J et collab. 2005. Conceptualiser et regrouper les données probantes pour guider le système de santé. http://www.fcrss.ca/migrated/pdf/mythbusters/evidence_f.pdf
12. Lomas J. 2007. Decision support: A new approach to making the best healthcare management and policy choices. Healthcare Quarterly; 10(3): 14-16.
13. Sackett DL. 1996. Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn’t. British Medical Journal; 312(7023): 71-72
14. Walshe K and Rundell TG. 2001. Evidence-based management from theory to practice in health care. Milbank Quarterly; 79: 429-457.
15. Lavis JN et al. 2002. Examining the role of health services research in public policymaking. Milbank Quarterly; 80: 125-154.
16. Clarke L, Clarke M and Clarke T. 2007. How useful are Cochrane reviews in identifying research needs? Journal of Health Services Research & Policy; 12(2): 101-103.
17. Collaboration Cochrane. www.cochrane.org/index.htm
18. Collaboration Campbell. www.campbellcollaboration.org/
19. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/
20. Institut Joanna Briggs. www.joannabriggs.edu.au/about/home.php
21. University of New Brunswick’s Canadian Research Institute for Social Policy (UNB CRISP). 2007. CRISPfacts. www.unb.ca/crisp/cfacts.html
22. Reardon R, Lavis J and Gibson J. 2006. From research to practice: A knowledge transfer planning guide. www.iwh.on.ca/assets/pdf/IWH_kte_workbook.pdf
23. Compact Oxford English Dictionary. www.askoxford.com/concise_oed/myth?view=uk
24. McDonough JE. 2006. Using and misusing anecdote in policy making. In F Mullan et al. (eds.) Narrative matters: The power of the personal essay in health policy. The Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, Maryland.
25. Haines A et al. 2004. Bridging the implementation gap between knowledge and action for health. Bulletin of the World Health Organization; 82: 724-732.
26. Fondation canadienne de la recherche sur les services de santé. 2005. Mythe : Un système privé parallèle réduirait les temps d’attente dans le système. http://www.fcrss.ca/migrated/pdf/mythbusters/myth17_f.pdf
27. Lexis Nexis. http://global.lexisnexis.com/us
28. FP Infomart. www.fpinfomart.ca/home/home.php
29. Factiva. http://factiva.com/
30. Media Doctor Canada. www.mediadoctor.ca/
31. Media Doctor Australia. www.mediadoctor.org.au/
32. Health News Review. http://www.healthnewsreview.org/about.php
33. Hitting the Headlines Archive. www.library.nhs.uk/rss/newsAndRssArchive.aspx?storyCategory=0
34. Kovach B and Rosenstiel T. 2001. The elements of journalism — What newspeople should know and the public should expect. Crown publishers: New York, New York.
35. Greenhalgh T. 1997. How to read a paper: Papers that summarise other papers (systematic reviews and meta-analyses). British Medical Journal; 315: 672-675. www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/315/7109/672
36. Shojania KG et al. 2007. How quickly do systematic reviews go out of date? A survival analysis. Annals of Internal Medicine; 147: 224-233.
37. Tonks A. 2007. Systematic reviews don’t last forever. British Medical Journal; 335: 178.
38. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Task Force Ratings: Strength of Recommendations and Quality of Evidence. Guide to Clinical Preventive Services. Third Edition: Periodic Updates, 2000-2003. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. www.ahrq.gov/clinic/3rduspstf/ratings.htm
39. Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. 2001. Levels of Evidence and Grades of Recommendation. www.cebm.net/levels_of_evidence.asp#levels
40. Shaxson L. 2004. Is your evidence robust enough? Questions for policymakers and practitioners. Evidence & Policy; 1(1): 101-111.
41. EMBASE. www.embase.com/
42. Cinahl Information Systems. www.cinahl.com/library/library.htm
43. PubMed. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez
44. PubMed Health Services Research (HSR) Queries. www.nlm.nih.gov/nichsr/hedges/search.html
45. Université de Waterloo. Texas information literacy tutorial (TILT). www.lib.uwaterloo.ca/tilt/nf/intro/internet.htm
46. Université de la Saskatchewan. 2005a. CINAHL. https://library.usask.ca/files/hsl/CINAHL%20OVID.pdf
47. Université de la Saskatchewan. 2004. Cochrane. https://library.usask.ca/files/hsl/cochrane04.pdf
48. Université de la Saskatchewan. 2005b. PubMed. https://library.usask.ca/files/hsl/pubmed.pdf
49. Université de la Saskatchewan. 2003. Critical reviews of journal articles. https://library.usask.ca/files/education/crja.pdf
50. Université de la Saskatchewan. Sans date. How to evaluate information sources. https://library.usask.ca/usered/evaluate_info
51. Greenhalgh T et al. 2004. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Quarterly; 82(4): 581-629.
52. Roberts M. 2006. Finding a story’s focus. www.concernedjournalists.org/node/474
53. Mullan F et al. 2006. Preface: About this book. In F Mullan et al. (eds.) Narrative matters: The power of the personal essay in health policy. The Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, Maryland.
54. Weiss CH. 1991. Policy research: Data, ideas, or arguments? In P. Wagner et al.’s (eds.) Social sciences and modern states: National experiences and theoretical crossroads. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 307-332.
55. Dube J. 2006. A dozen tips for writing news online. www.concernedjournalists.org/node/470
56. Committee of Concerned Journalists. (2006). Principles of journalism. www.journalism.org/resources/principles
57. Fondation canadienne de la recherche sur les services de santé. 2003. Il était une fois … L’usage et l’abus de récits et d’anecdotes dans le secteur de la santé — Rapport sur l’atelier annuel 2003 de la FCRSS. Ottawa (Ontario) : Fondation canadienne de la recherche sur les services de santé. http://www.fcrss.ca/migrated/pdf/mythbusters/2003_workshop_report_f.pdf
58. Mullen F. 1999. Me and the system: The personal essay and health policy. Health Affairs; 18(4): 118-125.
59. Fondation canadienne de la recherche sur les services de santé. 2006a. Améliorer la planification des congés pour mettre un terme au phénomène de la « porte tournante » dans les soins hospitaliers. www.fcrss.ca/migrated/pdf/mythbusters/boost5_f.pdf
60. Johnson T. 1998. Shattuck lecture: Medicine and the media. The New England Journal of Medicine; 339(2): 87-92.
61. Seale C. 2003. Health and media: An overview. Sociology of Health & Illness; 25(6): 513-531.
62. Denning S. 2006. Effective storytelling: strategic business narrative techniques. Strategy & Leadership; 34(1): 42-48.
63. Fondation canadienne de la recherche sur les services de santé. 2007. La narration efficace : techniques stratégiques d’exposé de fait en entreprise. Saisir et Agir. www.chsrf.ca/other_documents/insight_action/
    insight_and_action_f.php?intIssueID=16&strSearch=
64. Girard JP and Lambert S. 2007. The Story of Knowledge: Writing Stories that Guide Organisations into the Future. The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management; 5(2): 161-172. www.ejkm.com
65. Heath C and Heath D. 2007. Made to stick: Why some ideas survive and others die. Random House: New York.
66. Niles R. 2007. Statistics every writer should know: A simple guide to understanding basic statistics, for journalists and other writers who might not know math. http://nilesonline.com/stats/
67. Cassels A et al. 2003. Drugs in the news: How well do Canadian newspapers report the good, the bad and the ugly of new prescription drugs? http://policyalternatives.ca/documents/BC_Office_Pubs/drugs_in_news.pdf
68. Streiner DL. 1998. Risky business: Making sense of estimates of risk. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry; 43(4): 411-415.
69. Moore A and McQuay HJ. 2003. What is an NNT? What is. . . ? series. www.evidence-basedmedicine. co.uk/What_is_series.html
70. Streiner DL. 1991. Using meta-analysis in psychiatric research. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry; 36(5): 357-362.
71. McQuay HJ and Moore RA. 1997. Using numerical results from systematic reviews in clinical practice. Annals of Internal Medicine; 126(9): 712-720.
72. McKibbon A et al. 1999. PDQ evidence-based principles and practice. Hamilton, ON: BC Decker Inc.
73. NewsLab. 2006. Guide to great graphics. www.newslab.org/strategies/greatgraphics.htm
74. Fondation canadienne de la recherche sur les services de santé. 2006b. Mythe : Les risques auxquels la vaccination expose les enfants sont souvent plus grands que ses bienfaits. www.fcrss.ca/migrated/pdf/mythbusters/myth24_f.pdf
75. Boulton M. 2007. Whitespace. A List Apart Magazine. www.alistapart.com/articles/whitespace
76. Bear HJ. 2007. How to add white space. http://desktoppub.about.com/cs/designprinciples/ht/white_space.htm
77. Fondation canadienne de la recherche sur les services de santé. 2006c. Mythe : Le dépistage précoce est salutaire à tous. www.fcrss.ca/migrated/pdf/mythbusters/myth22_f.pdf
78. Bowen S, Martens PJ and The Need To Know Team. 2005. Demystifying ‘knowledge translation’: Learning from the community. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy; 10(4): 203-211.
79. Carpenter D et al. 2005. Development of a planning tool to guide dissemination of research results. In Advances in Patient Safety: From Research to Implementation. Volume 4: Programs, Tools, and Products. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: Rockville MD.
80. Hiss RG, Macdonald R and Davis WR. 1978. Identification of physician educational influentials in small community hospitals. Research in Medical Education. 17: 283-288.
81. Grzybowski S. 2000. Identifying educational influentials for formal and informal continuing medical education in the province of British Columbia. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions; 20: 85-90.
82. Doumit G et al. 2007. Local opinion leaders: Effects on professional practice and health care outcomes (Cochrane Review). In The Cochrane Library, Issue 1. Oxford: Update Software.
83. Lavis JN et al. 2003b. Measuring the impact of health research. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy; 8(3): 165-170.